• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2025)
Volume Volume 48 (2024)
Volume Volume 47 (2023)
Volume Volume 46 (2022)
Volume Volume 45 (2021)
Volume Volume 44 (2020)
Volume Volume 43 (2019)
Volume Volume 42 (2018)
Volume Volume 41 (2017)
Volume Volume 40 (2016)
Volume Volume 39 (2015)
Volume Volume 38 (2014)
Volume Volume 37 (2013)
Volume Volume 36 (2012)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 35 (2011)
Volume Volume 34 (2010)
Volume Volume 33 (2009)
Volume Volume 32 (2008)
Volume Volume 31 (2007)
M., E., EL, E., J, M., N, E. (2012). USE OF ABBREVIATIONS IN MEDICAL PRACTICE IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN EGYPT. Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine, 36(2), 177-190. doi: 10.21608/ejom.2012.759
El tehewy M.; EL Okda EL; Mohamed J; Essam N. "USE OF ABBREVIATIONS IN MEDICAL PRACTICE IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN EGYPT". Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine, 36, 2, 2012, 177-190. doi: 10.21608/ejom.2012.759
M., E., EL, E., J, M., N, E. (2012). 'USE OF ABBREVIATIONS IN MEDICAL PRACTICE IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN EGYPT', Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine, 36(2), pp. 177-190. doi: 10.21608/ejom.2012.759
M., E., EL, E., J, M., N, E. USE OF ABBREVIATIONS IN MEDICAL PRACTICE IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN EGYPT. Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine, 2012; 36(2): 177-190. doi: 10.21608/ejom.2012.759

USE OF ABBREVIATIONS IN MEDICAL PRACTICE IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN EGYPT

Article 4, Volume 36, Issue 2, July 2012, Page 177-190  XML PDF (272.48 K)
Document Type: Study paper
DOI: 10.21608/ejom.2012.759
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
El tehewy M.; EL Okda EL; Mohamed J; Essam N
Department of Community, Environmental and Occupational Medicine,Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Regardless of their convenience, medical abbreviations have been responsible for serious errors and deaths. Look-alike abbreviations or symbols, throughout the healthcare literature, are widespread examples of common errors. These problems involve numbers as well as letters. Objectives: To identify used abbreviations in medical records in surgical departments in El-demerdash hospital and to assess comprehension level of abbreviations written in medical records by medical and paramedical staff. Material and methods: A cross sectional study was done to review 400 medical records in surgical departments in El-demerdash hospital for identification of used abbreviations. Three hundred healthcare professionals in Eldemerdash hospital were inquired to identify the meaning of the top (5%) frequently used abbreviations in a self-administered questionnaire. Results: More than 900 different abbreviations were identified in the studied sample. Most of them (56%)were used in documenting history and physical examination followed by lab report (20.6%).When medical dictionary was used to identify meaning of the most frequently used abbreviations (top 10%) only (18.4%) of these abbreviations were identified. Meanings of abbreviations were obtained from five general surgery consultants. There were different abbreviations used for a single meaning and different meanings given to a single abbreviation. The factors that significantly affected the number of used abbreviations were length of stay, condition at discharge and department where the patient was staying. The most frequently used abbreviations (top5%) were circulated in a questionnaire to assess the comprehension of these abbreviations among El-demerdash staff. In general, there was poor understanding of the abbreviations used in medical records. Only 3 out of 34 abbreviations were interpreted correctly by more than (50%) of the study sample. Paramedical staff showed lower comprehension level than medical staff. Other factors significantly affected comprehension level of abbreviations include years of experience and last certificate obtained by the participant. Conclusion: The study showed that medical abbreviations are widely used in a non-standardized way in medical records of Eldemerdash hospital. The majority of healthcare professionals had poor understanding of commonly used abbreviations which affects communication during patient care and may lead to medical errors.
Keywords
missed
Main Subjects
Occupational diseases
Statistics
Article View: 377
PDF Download: 1,043
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.